Category Archives: Network Neutrality

Ask your senators to support privacy amendments in cybersecurity bill

UPDATE, 8/2/2012: This morning the U.S. Senate took a cloture vote to end debate on S.3414, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012. The vote was recorded as 52-46 meaning there was not the 60 votes necessary to advance the bill. This vote signals that the bill will likely not be taken up this year.

Thank you to all those who contacted your senators on this important issue. The fight to protect privacy is far from over though. Sign up for text alerts from the Washington Office to receive the most up to date information on advocacy alerts and events.

Check back right here on District Dispatch in the coming days for more analysis on this vote.

Call today

This week the Senate is considering major cybersecurity legislation, S. 3414 that could let the government collect your sensitive and personal internet records. The bill is in flux and subject to change during floor debate with “good” and “bad” amendments. Your calls can make the difference. It is imperative that you call your senators now.

 

  • Vote YES on privacy amendments like the Franken-Paul amendment so that companies do not have  the overbroad authority to monitor and even block our private communications, and,
  • Vote NO on anti-privacy amendments like the McCain and Hutchison amendments that would allow the NSA and military to directly collect and use Americans’ personal internet information.

Again, Vote YES on Franken-Paul and NO on antiprivacy amendments. Thank you!

Additional Resources:

About

Ted Wegner is the Grassroots Coordinator for ALA Washington Office's Office of Government Relations (OGR).

From the “couldn’t have said it much better” file…

Last week ALA Office for Information Technology Policy (OITP) intern Lauren Vilbert and I attended the National Journal Policy Briefing: Technology 2012 and Beyond featuring two panels of telecommunications and technology experts discussing issues ranging from broadband and innovation policy to privacy and data security to spectrum allocation. The policy summit was placed within the context of the 2012 elections, including advice to presidential hopefuls and future FCC chairpersons. While telecom was expected to be a “backburner” issue in the presidential primaries, there certainly was much to discuss, including recent activity on network neutrality and Universal Service Fund reform.

A personal favorite among the panelists (more on them later) was Larry Irving, past Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and widely credited with coining the term “the digital divide.” I couldn’t have asked for much more in his response to my question about the current state of the digital divide and the roles libraries can and should play:

Libraries have done an amazing job. And, as you know, we had a process – we were going to get every school, every library, [thanks to the E-rate!] and every health clinic connected.

When I go back home, most kids today have devices. We want to reach kids where they are, instead of where you want them to be. We need to find more compelling ways to use those devices. I’ve worked with the [Bill & Melinda] Gates Foundation and the American Library Association for years rethinking how libraries could and should be connected.

One of the great tragedies in this country is as we’ve seen declines in state and local revenue, one of the first places they cut is libraries. This is horrific[…]. Libraries have taught people the skills to drive on the Information Superhighway.

I recently posted on Facebook about a quote from Abraham Lincoln that one of the bad things about the Internet is that it’s hard to tell what are accurate quotes. That’s clearly not a Lincoln quote, but that’s the point. There’s still a need to separate the wheat from the chaff.  Libraries can help people separate what’s good information, what’s bad information and how to use trusted resources.

There’s a crucial need for what you [libraries] are doing. There’s a crucial need for funding of libraries, and a crucial need for funding Internet access for libraries to provide wifi and other critical resources.

So…you can see why he was a personal favorite.

But there was a lot to like and learn over the course of the morning. Opening speakers were Congressman Lee Terry, Vice Chair, Subcommittee on Communications and Technology for the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee, and former Congressman Rick Boucher, the 2006 Library Journal Politician of the Year. They disagreed on network neutrality, but found common ground in foreseeing a need for Congress to draft new telecom legislation that would recognize convergences in voice, data and video. Both agreed the 1996 Telecommunications Act was created in an analog and siloed world that separated the FCC’s work into the wireline, wireless and media bureaus. They argued we now live in a vastly different digital era that demands a more harmonized regulatory approach (rather than different regulations for different communications technologies). Boucher also emphasized the need for improving digital privacy rights and data security, recommending national security standards based on federal adoption of strong state-level laws (such as in California). Reallocation of spectrum and incentive auctions also was forecast as a major area of focus for the coming year.

Many of these threads were continued during a second panel with Antoinette C. Bush, Ambassador David A. Gross, Larry Irving, and Bruce P. Mehlman. Additionally, Gross forecasts that 2012 will be a “seminal” year for international telecommunications, starting with the World Radio Conference in Geneva in January, and ending with the 2012 World Conference on International Telecommunications next December, which poses a “direct threat to the Internet” as the body considers revisions to the International Telecommunication Regulations. All of the panelists agreed that the United States cannot look at telecommunications issues only through a national lens. Decisions made in this country about privacy and data security, for instance, have international implications and repercussions.

Panelists offered the following advice for a 2012 president:

  • Use the bully pulpit. The country needs a compelling narrative and holistic approach to tackling technology and telecommunications issues.
  • Focus on jobs, the economy and foreign policy. Telecommunications is not rising to the level of presidential politics this year, according to Bush.
  • Focus on global competitiveness, which implicates education, infrastructure and immigration policy.
  • Think globally.

and any future FCC chairperson:

  • Carry out Congressional will, be transparent and talk/listen to Congress. While there was appreciation for Chairman Julius Genachowski taking on Universal Service Fund reform, there was frustration that the Connect America Fund Order was still not available for reading at the time of the panel.

Overall, it was two hours well spent as we speed toward 2012. If you’d like to experience it for yourself, the archived video is available at the National Journal website.

About Larra Clark

As Director of OITP's Program on Networks, and Associate Director of OITP's Program on America’s Libraries for the 21st Century, Larra’s responsibilities include overall management of OITP’s telecommunications portfolio and day-to-day management of our projects in partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Previously, she served as the project manager in the ALA Office for Research & Statistics for three years.

Anti-net neutrality bill defeated in the U.S. Senate

Some good news on the net neutrality front! Today, after months of anticipation, the Senate voted on S.J. Res. 6 – an anti-net neutrality bill to overturn the Net Neutrality decision adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).  The final, partisan vote – 46 yeas and 52 nays – defeated the bill!

The defeat of the bill sends a clear message that libraries and those they serve (the public) not only care strongly about this issue but also depend upon a free and open internet to provide unfettered  access to all types of information.  The bill’s demise now ensures that the FCC order will take effect on November 20.

Thank you to all who reached out and contacted their senators on this very important bill.  In addition, thank you to those state librarians and state library association members who provided targeted letters to their senators in key states urging them to defeat the bill.  The calls and letters were invaluable in influencing the outcome of this vote!

This outcome – the defeat of S.J. Res. 6 – is a big win for libraries and those we serve!

Corey Williams
Associate Director
Office of Government Relations

P.S.  History on this issue is available on the ALA’s “Net Neutrality Legislative Activity” site and includes links to letters the ALA sent to both the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.

About Jacob Roberts

Jacob Roberts is the communications specialist for the ALA Washington Office.

Ask your senators to vote “NO” on overturning net neutality order

This week (Nov. 7-11) the full U.S. Senate will vote on Senate Joint Resolution 6, a bill to overturn the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) order passed to adopt “net neutrality.”

Please call your Senators and ask them to vote “NO” on S.J. Res. 6.  You may reach your Senators by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.  Your call sends a loud and clear message that libraries depend on an open and nondiscriminatory Internet to provide our patrons, the public, unfettered access to information.

Additional talking points:

•    Voting no helps preserve the openness of the Internet which is essential to our nation’s educational achievement, freedom of speech and economic growth.
•    Without an open and neutral Internet, there is great risk that commercial Internet Service Providers (ISPs) will give higher priority to some users (e.g. give entertainment priority over education).
•    ISPs may seek to impose additional fees on Internet users which could drastically impact libraries who require much greater bandwidth than households to serve their patrons, many at one time.

This anti-net neutrality resolution, if passed, would strike at the heart of libraries’ ability to ensure patrons have open, unfettered access to all types of information.

Additional information, including links to the letter the ALA sent to Senate leadership, is available here

To find out who you senator is, click here

About

Ted Wegner is the Grassroots Coordinator for ALA Washington Office's Office of Government Relations (OGR).

Amendments and hearings and joint resolutions – oh my! Net neutrality’s week in review

Last week was a rough one for network (net) neutrality supporters, especially in the U.S. House of Representatives.  Following the introduction of the President’s 2012 budget request, the House swung into gear offering up a number of budget-reducing amendments, including one from Rep. Walden (R-OR-2) that would bar the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using any funds to implement its net neutrality order.

Meanwhile, a couple U.S. House subcommittees got busy holding hearings on net neutrality. The  House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology called all five FCC Commissioners to testify at their hearing titled “Network Neutrality and Internet Regulation: Warranted or More Economic Harm than Good?”  The ALA, along with the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and EDUCAUSE, weighed in by sending a letter to House leadership, expressing opposition to using the Congressional Review Act or any other legislation to overturn or undermine recently enacted net neutrality rules passed by the FCC.   And the library and higher educations organizations were not alone –  our letter was joined by several others in support of net neutrality, ranging from small businesses to Catholic bishops.  The day before, the U.S. House Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet held its own hearing titled, “Ensuring Competition on the Internet: Net Neutrality and Antitrust.”

By midweek, Senate republicans joined in on the action and introduced a joint resolution (S.J. Res. 6), along with their colleagues in the House (H.J. Res. 37), disapproving the net neutrality order approved by the FCC.  Then, in a flurry of activity in the House leading up to the vote on H.R. 1, the Continuing Resolution (CR) for the budget, the anti-net neutrality amendment offered by Rep. Walden passed.

So, where does all this leave the issue of net neutrality? For one thing, the House Republicans have clearly voiced their dislike of net neutrality and have taken several different legislative approaches to pull the plug on the FCC’s order and its ability to enforce it – at the same time punting the issue over to the Senate.  While the House action on net neutrality wasn’t all that surprising (even anticipated, quite honestly), it is less clear what the issue’s fate might be in the Senate.  While the Senate Democrats hold the majority, it will take all acting in unity to ultimately support net neutrality when it comes time to vote.

A complete list net neutrality-related activity during the 112th Congress is available here.

Corey Williams
Associate Director, Office of Government Relations