Apparently Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) learned nothing from the overwhelming outpouring of opposition to the worst of the USA PATRIOT Act earlier this month. They’re using the Senate Rules to try to ram through – as early as tomorrow – privacy-hostile legislation that’s received no public hearing or Senate floor debate as an amendment to a Department of Defense funding measure. The bill, innocuously dubbed the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (“CISA”), would expose enormous amounts of your personal data to federal, state, and even local law enforcement … without a warrant. Along with many coalition partners, ALA strongly opposed CISA in a letter to Senate leaders last March.
Sometimes, you just can’t explain anything better than a colleague, and Gabe Rottman of the ACLU’s Washington Office spoke up yesterday (with many links to detailed background information) about this issue and the immediate procedural threat in the Senate:
“So, what does the bill . . . do? It’s a surveillance bill, pure and simple. It says that any and all privacy laws, including laws requiring a warrant for electronic communications, and those that protect financial, health or even video rental records, do not apply when companies share ‘cybersecurity’ information, broadly defined, with the government.”
“VOTE NO on the ‘Burr Amendment’ to the defense bill – or on any such “information sharing” bill without full public hearings and Senate debate.”
Latest posts by Adam Eisgrau (see all)
- Section 702: Advocates brace for surveillance reform fight - October 6, 2017
- Libraries again oppose unneeded, risky Section 108 update - September 29, 2017
- Copyright Office releases draft bill to change Section 108 - September 19, 2017